Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

This is a Soap Box section of our Forum where those who hold passionate views/opinions regarding various aspects of Theology, Creation, Religion, Paranormal etc - pertaining to the Yowie can be POLITELY debated, away from our mainstream friendly Yowie / Bigfoot Discussion Board.

Be kind to each other. Our standard rules of etiquette and behaviour apply in all areas of our Forum.
User avatar
BillTheCat
Bronze Status
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:10 pm
Position: UFO Chaser
Location: Rural estate south of Canberra

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by BillTheCat »

Night Walker wrote:To all Forum Users:

Put up your hand if you took offence at Muppet’s tirade. Be honest.


I saw nothing offensive but I suspect that my opinion probably doesn't matter.

The amount of ugly, cancerous and vitriolic garbage in this thread is highly disappointing.

Night Walker wrote:I overheard someone who suggested that AYR should stand for Arrogant Yahoo Rednecks. I thought that was uncalled for yet I am beginning to wonder about the applicability of the Yowie Research part of the name. Since joining late in ‘08 I have seen a drunken expedition, sloppy field work, misleading report writing, flights of fantasy, and insensitive comments against someone in hard times.




More science and who knows, we might actually end up with a new member in the Australian Faunal Catalogue.

As for inter-dimensional, phase-shifting bigfoot/orbs... Well I respect doctorscreams rights to believe in this 'theory'; however there is very little real content in any of the 'on-topic' postings in this thread.

No doubt these hyper-bigfeet are residents of Atlantis (somewhere in the middle of the Bermuda Triangle)...

How the hell did this go from a simple question (Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?) to Jinn's from the Koran????

Lighten up everyone and stay on topic.
There's always someone cleverer than yourself. Always!
User avatar
Big Cats
Bronze Status
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:10 pm
Position: Flesh and Blood

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Big Cats »

Hi All

Earlier I mentioned the book "Hunt for the Skinwalker". I would recommend that everyone on this thread obtain a copy

Kelleher Colm A. Ph.D., Knapp George, "Hunt for the Skinwalker", Paraview Pocket Books, Sydney, 2005, ISBN 978-1-4165-0521-1; & ISBN 1-4165-0521-0

and read pages 143 to 147.

I would then like to hear your comments.

Paul
Big Cats
http://uqconnect.net/~zzpclach/index.htm

"Make No Comparisons
Make No Judgments
Delete Your Need to Understand"


Joy Brugh W., “Joy’s Way”, Tarcher / Putnam (Penguin), New York, 1979, ISBN 0-87477-085-8. pp. 60 - 66.
User avatar
AussieTrev
Bronze Status
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:33 am
Position: I'm with stupid....
Location: Near Penrith, NSW

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by AussieTrev »

Gday Night Walker,
To all Forum Users:

Put up your hand if you took offence at Muppet’s tirade. Be honest.
If you are talking about the first one that was changed, well.... I missed it... :( (anyone have a copy?)
...... or if you are talking about the ones that still remain, then I can't say that I do take offence to them. (cheers)
I don't actually know what all of the fuss is about? :wink: (cheesy)

As for your earlier comment.....
Flesh and blood 24/7. If it walks, eats, sh*ts, and sleeps then it is as REAL. Incredibly elusive but real.
HOW DARE YOU come in here with such nonsense!!! This is the kind of response and attitude that will get you..... nah, just kidding, (lol) ....... in my books, that is 100% correct. I don't know of any scat samples from ghosts. (steamer)

There is no reason why people who collect footprint casts of yowies believe that they are paranormal in any way. If it can make a footprint in the ground, then it shouldn't be able to walk through you or walls........ should it?... (alien)
I will believe the paranormal version of the yowie when I see one vanish before my very own eyes. (cool)

Although, I suppose that I would be happy enough just to see a yowie in the first place. (cheesy) :lol: Trev
doctorscream

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by doctorscream »

I had the opportunity to visit with another research team who had been quite successful at getting strange stuff to occur at their research site. Things like cameras and tape recorders being turned off when they put them outside the windows of their vehicles, bigfoot turning into orbs, rattling of old rusted containers from being hit with a rock yet no rocks were in or around the container, bigfoot snorting and then running up a log while doing dimension changes on the fly leaving nothing left but the wind blowing on leaves at the far end of the log, beeping noises coming from the brush, small swirling clouds coming briefly out of the ground and then disappearing back into the ground, etc. You know. Ordinary bigfoot stuff. Yet virtually all of the research team was in total denial of the bigfoot being anything other than dumb animals. None had college degrees I might add. It seems that they were certain that humans were higher on the pecking order ladder, and bigfoot were somewhere below us. When asked about whether they thought that bigfoot could be people, those that had seen a bigfoot, (and most of them had), were certain that they were not people. They apparently came to that scientific conclusion based on appearances. mmmm! Perhaps we should rewrite the "scientific method" so that it is based purely on opinions of appearance. When asked about all the strange stuff, they just blocked that out of their mind because they could not explain it. And they certainly would not attribute the strange stuff as evidence that bigfoot were either intelligent, were people or that they possessed special abilities that they were showing off to them. I sat around the campfire with my jaw agape, in total disbelief at what I was listening to. One after the other, each revealing evidence of their own copout at attempting to study a scientific mystery with an open mind. When asked to describe what happened on the individual events, they could not recall all the details because most were not observing as scientists, but instead were trying to fit what they just saw or heard into a known flesh & blood phenomenon that they were already familiar with. They were there strictly for the sightings and the discovery of footprints. No other research thought processes were going on. Even if they had a hundred sightings and found a hundred footprints, they would not have contributed to Bigfoot/Yowie research by plugging in a single jigsaw puzzle piece, in order to bring that mystery to a resolution.

So each person on this board might give some thought as to exactly what their intended purpose is, and what they hope to accomplish, in Bigfoot/Yowie research. Are you going to attempt to fit some new pieces into the board, or are you going to kick the board and scatter the pieces? The choice is yours.
User avatar
Big Cats
Bronze Status
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:10 pm
Position: Flesh and Blood

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Big Cats »

Hi There DoctorScream

Scientists are supposed to observe, formulate an hypothesis and then endeavour to explain their observations to fit in with their hypothesis. Then they are supposed to replicate those observations with experimentation. That is what science is supposed to be.

Investigators are supposed to observe, collect the various forms of evidence and then report their observations and evidence in a factual report. At no stage are they to make any interpretations, just report the facts. This is what an Investigation is supposed to be.

So, what are we seeing here in this thread?

Paul
Big Cats
http://uqconnect.net/~zzpclach/index.htm

"Make No Comparisons
Make No Judgments
Delete Your Need to Understand"


Joy Brugh W., “Joy’s Way”, Tarcher / Putnam (Penguin), New York, 1979, ISBN 0-87477-085-8. pp. 60 - 66.
stickyfingers

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by stickyfingers »

Big Cats wrote:Hi There DoctorScream

Scientists are supposed to observe, formulate an hypothesis and then endeavour to explain their observations to fit in with their hypothesis. Then they are supposed to replicate those observations with experimentation. That is what science is supposed to be.

Investigators are supposed to observe, collect the various forms of evidence and then report their observations and evidence in a factual report. At no stage are they to make any interpretations, just report the facts. This is what an Investigation is supposed to be.

So, what are we seeing here in this thread?

Paul
Big Cats
...possibly the biggest schitt stir that these forums have ever had??? (rad) (lol) (poke tongues) ... I find the intergalctic-transmandental-orbificationalistic-crossdimensional-shapeshifting-paranormaticalising Yowie to be quite an interesting concept to be quite honest!!!!!... hmmmm... now I have another brainache (curse) ... I may have to have another lie down methinks!... cheers... Stickyfingers. (cool) (happy) (jest)
User avatar
Big Cats
Bronze Status
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:10 pm
Position: Flesh and Blood

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Big Cats »

Hi There StickyFingers

A Bex, a Coke (Coca Cola) and a lie down, is always a good thing.

Paul
Big Cats
http://uqconnect.net/~zzpclach/index.htm

"Make No Comparisons
Make No Judgments
Delete Your Need to Understand"


Joy Brugh W., “Joy’s Way”, Tarcher / Putnam (Penguin), New York, 1979, ISBN 0-87477-085-8. pp. 60 - 66.
doctorscream

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by doctorscream »

Please direct us to the official agency upon whose approval such factual report is to be obtained, prior to publishing. Please direct us to the location that such report would be published. Please direct us to the distribution list to whom such report would be sent, at the expense of the distributor of course.

Obviously none of this exists. Consequently, I will put you in the column for "not wishing to contribute" to furthering the efforts of Bigfoot/Yowie research. Unfortunately, I fear that you have lots of company. In the States, nobody wants the Bigfoot/Yowie mystery to be resolved either, or at least resolved by someone other than themselves. Why? Because each so called researcher wants to mold the resolution to fit their initial prejudices that they are comfortable with, and furthermore they want to each become famous for resolving it. Which is why Bigfoot research in the U.S., is not likely to make any progress this century, in my opinion. When I was young, everyone ncluding my grandmother knew that the Bigfoot were interdimensional/paranomal/invisible. That knowledge has slowly been wiped clear of U.S. society so that later generations are not subject to the incredible mental trauma that people actually exist in the higher dimensions alongside mankind. Which is just one of the ways that the U.S. has succeeded in breeding new generations of spoiled candy ass whinners, with effeminant personalities and misdirected sexual orientation. Just turn on the American TV if you want proof of that.

The old country saying of "cowboy up" to new challenges has fallen by the wayside, since new generations cannot deal with unusual concepts that they have been deliberately starved of by a carefully choreographed disinformation process imbedded in the U.S. educational system. Apparently, Australia has followed suit since there appears to be no shortage of persons who resist real progress in Bigfoot/Yowie research.

Here is some more of my opinions that are based on field observations that I will short circuit some alleged auduous reporting process and not put it in a report that gets buried in a library somewhere, you can just treat them as a "heads up" to look for in the field:
Bigfoot/Yowie are highly telepathic in that they can read mans tiniest thought from a considerable distance.
B/Y are much more numerous than anyone can possibly imagine since they normally are invisible in the higher dimensions and cannot be counted. I estimate 10 million in North America alone.
B/Y understand the local language if they live near man.
B/Y will live next to houses and homes and remain undetected by all except perhaps the dogs.
B/Y would much prefer to be our friend than our enemy
B/Y do not need food from us and want only to be respected as people, but they sure like maple syrup.
B/Y have a high level of internal electricity that they use for changing dimenions by changing the frequency of vibrations of certain types of free quanta energy loops, (as described in X3 by Adrian Dvir). They learn dimension changing from their parents and do not have to know the mechanics of it.
B/Y emit strong electromagnetic radiation when in the first two favorite removed dimensions from man's, which allows us to point directly at an invisible Bigfoot even though standing 30 meters away. It feels like heat on your face.
B/Y loves to be our friend, our pal, our buddy, and our mate. And then hang out around camp and be included in the conversations as if they were just one of the guys.
B/Y MAY be the supernatural force that grants your wishes, knows whether you have been naughty or nice, and may be able to influence the future of mankind. But that is all still in the hypothetical stage, but it certainly does not hurt to go out of your way to be nice to them, just in case. I play music to them.
topender
Forum Moderator
Posts: 629
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:42 pm
Position: Field Researcher
Location: The wilds of northern territory

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by topender »

I come from a fairly lengthy and diverse science background, nontheless when in the field i Observe, Record, and Document, i avoid doing the "WOW i think that this means..blah blah" routine.
I have collected lots of bits and pieces of information and plenty of anecdotal info, there are several people that i trust around Oz who are / have an interest in this field, some are Naturalists, Anthropologists and Yowie researchers, i forward my stuff to them and ask their opinion........maybe in 10years or so i may be in a position to give an opinion until then i defer to those who know, in the meantime i continue to skulk through jungles and gorges with my eyes, ears and "senses" in the ON position.

cheers all
This planet is a one big farm, we are not the farmers but the stock
doctorscream

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by doctorscream »

One of the earliest records by white man of the supernatural nature of the Bigfoot, is contained in Chapter 3 of the 1924 Ape Canyon Story as told by Fred Beck:

http://saintclaircountybigfoot.wetpaint ... %7D?t=anon


"Early one morning Hank came back to the tent. He was rather excited. He led us to the moist-sand bar, and took us almost to the center. There in the center of the sand bar were two huge tracks about four inches deep. There was not another track on that sand bar! There we were standing in the middle of the sand bar, and not one of us could conceive any earthly thing taking steps 160 feet long. "No human being could have made these tracks," Hank said, "and there's only one way they could be made, something dropped from the sky and went back up." There was no third step. "

I rest my case, your honor!
User avatar
Dion
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:44 pm
Position: Researcher

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Dion »

I suggest people reread quotes made by Dean and Ruby on the subject of Paranormality. There is a lot to be learned; cases such as invisibility and so forth are not uncommon.

The case of Jerry and Sue O’Connor Yowie visitation in Ruby’s post is astounding to say the least and should not be overlooked.

There are many stories of yowie/bigfoot paranormality all over the web if one would just do there research you’ll find them.

Doctorscream last post in regards to Fred Beck and his encounter are just one of many.

Deans quote from the thread “psychic, paranormal yowies” viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1211
Dean Harrison wrote:I don’t believe there is any just cause for anyone to speak harshly, we’re all friends here and I hope it remains this way. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and mine just so happens to be based on my experience, yet have normally been reluctant to speak about publically and still don't feel very comfortable about it.

I have experienced certain unexplainable events, and 90% of our witnesses have also, which is a statistic ignorant to dismiss.

Not only do Humans experience this “Nameless Dread” which is well documented, but also animals.

When there is one in the area, not only do Humans and Animals become affected, but also insects. The entire area can be teaming with life, animals such as birds, wallabies, cane toads, cicadas, crickets and then within seconds everything changes. It becomes deathly quiet, not a creature stirs and there is an ungodly sensation in the air that is like ice. Goose bumps appear on your arms and the hair raises on the back of your neck.

Then it arrives, lurking in the bushes……..

Same is common in most reports where the witnesses tell of a feelings of being watched, a sensation of dread, a sudden feeling of vulnerability for no apparent reason. Then the sighting/encounter begins. Pets can also begin to behave strangely prior to activity.

Not endorsing this, however there are a lot of people who claim to have seen them vanish or have them walk around them with no form. I know two people who say they were forced off a cliff when being chased by ‘footsteps’ in the grass and they spent 3 weeks in Hospital. Yes that all sounds a little heavy to swallow, but it’s a common World Wide phenomena whether people like hearing it or not. A friend of mine had one walking around his car, but he couldn’t see it.

While on expedition we had something approximate estimate from the weight – 200kg on two feet, walk heavily all the way up a side of a hill to within 5m of us. When it arrived we turned on the spotlights, not a sound and there was nothing to be seen. I can’t explain that. It was an event that totally bewilders me. The last foot fell within milliseconds of pressing the button only a few metres from where we stood.


Why is there no physical evidence other than sightings, plaster casts and foliage damage? Having witnessed the speed and strength during some nights in the field, perhaps I can see why….. Far too large and powerful, with abilities beyond ours for us to bring one down. I doubt a normal gun would have stopped the one that chased me in Ormeau. The only aspect that I believe saved me was the fact that I had the head start to an open field and eventually a street light.

When he was stalking me, I at first thought it was a Human and paid little mind, in fact I was looking forward to some games, but then my body suddenly locked totally paralysed and I have unearthly chills all over my body that were not natural. It was at that point I knew there was something very wrong and certainly not normal.

When he was chasing me, it’s hard to explain unless you have experienced it, however the feelings being projected absorbed me. There was such anger.

If indeed they do have some form of psychic capacity greater than ours, they may have the ability to pick up on mind energy, thus the outcome of a study we conducted three years ago which concluded a very large percentage of people who have had encounters either had mental/physical pain or were doing something a little naughty at the time, thus heightening their mind energy. I know this also happened to me on a few occasions.

I know a lot of people that use mind energy to attract them, including Aboriginals.

Same in return, this mind energy (or whatever people would prefer to call it), if being far greater than ours, could, just could be, how they can project this Nameless Dread upon everything surrounding them, if they wish.

I recall (as some of you all may also), while on Expedition at Kilkivan. Myself, Brett Green, Mick Dale and Trevor were at base when an Elephant on two legs steamrolled through the forest smashing down tree’s on the other side of the creek. I asked the others to keep talking and act natural, while I go and get the footage. I was determined, very confident and feeling bullet proof.

I raced down the creek and quick as I could, extremely excited. The moment I stepped up onto that bank, I hit a wall of ice that not only shut ME down, but also every living animal around me also.

I was determined not to let it win, so I continued on step by step. I became nauseous, sweating, shaking, goose bumps, cold and hair on end. Every step I placed made me more and more ill until finally I dropped to the ground and couldn’t move. I evaluated myself throughly many times, and it was not a fear or sickness coming from with in. It was more like being somehow riddled with negative external energy like a force field (that’s the only way I can put it). I knew it was right there somewhere and the Dread was flowing through my veins.

It wasn’t until 4 minutes later I could begin to move. Right at that point all the animals and bugs became alive and definitelynoisy again. Now I could move again, I checked every tree, rock and hiding place, but it was gone. Without a sound. Something that large in dense dry foliage and dry leafy ground, to vanish without breaking a twig was extraordinary to say the least.

I do know that from my very own experiences at least, that there is most certainly an ability or as I have said, an energy, to them that we can’t quite explain and there is no ignoring or escaping it. It’s a World Wide trait that most researchers accept these days.

Always best to keep an open mind, after all, Yowies don’t exist either, right?


DMH

Ruby’s quote form the thread “The Yowie” viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10
Ruby Lang wrote:Hi Guys,

Well, I have believed for some time that there is a paranormal aspect to the yowie mystery.

The native custodians of this land, the Aborigines, have referred to them as spirit beings as well as flesh and blood...and then there are those 'backward pointing feet'. Hardly the physical attribute of a flesh and blood creature - and a characteristic of faerie creatures in mythology worldwide.

Let me direct some of the more well-read members of the forum to the Myths and Monsters 2001 talk given by researcher Tony Healy (co-author of Out of the Shadows and the soon-to-be-released The Yowie File), who has also explored the paranormal dimension to the yowie in his talk "High Strangeness in Yowie Reports": Are the hairy giants flesh and blood - or are they psychic phenomena? Yowies appear to be part of a world-wide phenomenon of strikingly similar traditions of uncatchable ape-men occur in many other parts of the world.

I reproduce it here in full because I know 99.9% of people won't bother to look it up or consider any of the arguments :shock:

Ruby

"The vast majority of people who report yowie sightings sincerely believe they haveencountered living, breathing animals - some kind of extremely elusive ape or giant,primitive hominid. Their eyewitness testimony is supported by footprints, tree bites and otherphysical evidence which proves the creatures are much more than mere hallucinations. Thereare, however, many other elements of the mystery which suggest it may not be ananthropological or zoological problem at all - but perhaps something a great deal weirder:some kind of psychic phenomenon.

Many yowie researchers dislike any mention of the supernatural and feel that proponents ofthe paranormal are attempting to solve one problem by creating another. They are concernedthat people who raise the spectre - so to speak - of the paranormal will strengthen the hand ofthe sceptics, confuse the media and scare off those few scientists who have been courageousenough to express an interest in cryptozoology.I can understand their reactions - I had the same attitude myself for several years.

But if wereject everything about the yowie which smacks of the paranormal we will have to sweep approximately 20% of the accumulated data under the carpet. To do that would be not onlyunscientific - but also plain dishonest. Nothing would thrill me more than for someone to prove conclusively that yowies arephysically real - but I now suspect that will never happen. After 25 years on their trail I am strongly inclined to believe the creatures are shape-shifting phantoms which may alwaysremain beyond human comprehension.I may be wrong ( and in fact I hope I am ) but as Fred Beck, one of the miners who wasinvolved in the famous 1924 bigfoot encounter, known as the Ape Canyon Incident, oncesaid, ?It is no sin to be wrong, just as it does not make a person a saint to be right.?

(1)There are many reasons why I suspect there is something quite uncanny about the yowie. Idon't have space here to discuss them all, so I will focus instead on just three majorconsiderations:1. Elusive hairy giants are a world-wide phenomenon.Uncatchable hairy ape-men have been reported in every state and territory of Australia, invirtually every state and province of the USA and Canada, in Guatemala, Panama, Colombia,Brazil, Argentina, Russia, Nepal, China, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, NewGuinea, New Zealand, Kenya, India and even Japan.For centuries tens of thousands of armed men - aboriginies, explorers, trappers, hunters,prospectors, soldiers - have roamed most of the areas concerned, wiping out whole species oflarge animals - and races of people - yet no museum has so much as a finger bone of a yeti toexamine.

I just cannot see how giant apes could have avoided being captured, killed or clearlyphotographed in one or other of those areas - unless they have an avoidance technique whichis way beyond our ken.Yowie and bigfoot - the terrible twinsI now believe that the elusive ape-men of Australia and North America are not just verysimilar but are, in fact, exactly the same creature. There is not space here to list all thesupporting evidence but it boils down, essentially, to this:In virtually all aspects of their appearance, their behaviour and the reactions they engender inother animals, in tribal people, modern witnesses, believers and sceptics, the animals areidentical. (2)There is reason to suspect the Himalayan yeti and several other types of elusive ape-men arealso part of the same phenomenon.

2. Hot Spots: The yowie/black panther/lake monster/UFO connectionThe second major consideration is this: localities which produce hairy man reports alsofrequently produce reports of other strange phenomena.In the year I spent on the trail of the sasquatch I concentrated, naturally, on areas whereNative Americans had always believed in the hairy giants and where white people hadreported sightings since the frontier days. To my surprise I found that in virtually all of thoselocations people had also reported a variety of other strange, uncatchable animals. The mostcommon of these were ?black panthers? and Loch Ness style lake and river monsters. Severalof these "hot spots" also produced a large number of UFO reports.To give just one example:?O Canada - you're so weird?Many sasquatch sightings have occurred near the village of Easterville, Manitoba, which issituated on a thin isthmus surrounded by Lake Winnipeg, Lake Winnipegosis and Cedar Lake,all of which have produced many lake monster reports.The lake monsters have been seen out of the water, on beaches or in swamps, on at least threeoccasions. On one occasion a sasquatch was seen wading out of Lake Winnipeg. Although mountain lions are believed not to exist at all in Manitoba, four ?black panther?sightings also occurred in the immediate area. The three different types of mystery animalswere all reported within a radius of 10 miles. In North Carolina and Florida I interviewed people whose properties had been visited by boththe bigfoot and black panthers. One witness had been fortunate enough to sight both types ofanimal. Here in Australia the same pattern has emerged: many yowie ?hot spots? such as the BlueMountains and the Batemans Bay to Bega area also produce reports of several other types ofstrange, elusive animals. As in America the most common of these is the ?black panther?,and, as in America, some lucky individuals have actually seen both types of creatures.

Yowies and bunyips
The unlikely link between giant ape-men and lake and river monsters is less evident inAustralia than in America, but I believe it does exist.One area which has produced a plethora of yowie, black panther and bunyip reports since the1820s is the ACT and immediate environs.

(3)The UFO/Yowie LinkIn North America an apparent link between bigfoot and UFOs has been noted on manyoccasions. Between June 1973 and February 1974 in western Pennsylvania there was aphenomenal outbreak of weirdness which yielded 118 bigfoot and not less than 600 UFOreports. On a dozen occasions low flying UFOs were reported immediately before or after abigfoot sighting.

(4)Definite yowie/UFO connections are much rarer but they have been reported.In January 1975 people near Goolma NSW observed a UFO descend and possibly land. Overthe following two weeks there was an intense wave of yowie reports - which suddenly ceasedafter a second UFO was seen.

(5)Some yowie and bigfoot enthusiasts simply ignore the apparent UFO connection and others,like the irascible Rene Dahinden, love to ridicule the idea. Sometimes, however, the link is soobvious it simply can't be swept aside.Consider these two cases:(a) On 27 September 1973 two witnesses in Beaver County, Pennsylvania, told of seeing awhite, hair-covered creature with red eyes ?carrying a luminescent sphere in its hand?. Otherpeople saw a strange craft hovering over the woods into which the creature disappeared.

(6)(b) In June 1975 at Tailem Bend, SA, two groups of people saw a giant hairy ape-man withwhat looked like a lantern in his hand. A third group saw a huge illuminated dome-shape inthe same field.

(7)Significantly, local Aborigines say the Murray River at Tailem Bend is inhabited by a bunyipknown as the Moolgewanke which resembles an ape-like man ?more than ten feet tall ... longblack hair, dark red eyes, large teeth and webbed hands and feet.?

(8)So at Tailem bend we have a yowie/bunyip / UFO link. 3. High Strangeness in Yowie reportsThe third major consideration is simply the sheer, out- and- out weirdness of some details insome reports. Some of the weirdest details have cropped up time and again, in both Australiaand overseas.

?Nameless dread?
No doubt an unexpected encounter with an 8 foot tall ape would give anyone a bit of a jolt,but some yowie witnesses - and their horses and dogs as well - become much more frightenedthan you would reasonably expect.In 1912 a surveyor, Charles Harper, said that when he and two assistants were approached by"a huge man-like animal" in the Currickbilly Range of south-east NSW his fierce huntingdogs retreated whining and one of his assistants fainted and ?remained unconscious forseveral hours.?

(9)Exactly the same thing happened near Easterville, Manitoba, in the early 1970s: a witnessfainted dead away, later suffered recurring nightmares and could not sleep without a loadedgun beside his bed.

(10)In 1998, at a village on the NSW south coast, a friend of mine noticed a huge hairy hominidobserving her from the treeline and immediately experienced almost unbearable fearcombined with the feeling that her spine was literally in the icy grip of something quitesinister.Later, on a nearby fire trail the horse she was riding stopped dead, trembled, almost crouched,and stared fixedly into the bush. Seconds later, as the woman again felt the icy fear, the horseturned and, unprompted, galloped three miles home.That story illustrates one of the strangest things about the ?nameless dread?: you don?t have toactually see, hear, or smell the hairy giants to be poleaxed by overwhelming fear.Many such reports have been noticed by North American researchers. As early as 1970 LeeTrippett of Oregon stated ?He [the bigfoot] can terrorise you from the far side of a mountain.?Feeling Abominable It seems the elusive hairy giants of the Himalayas also possess the handy ability to zap othercreatures telepathically.In 1983 a Scottish scientist, Bill Grant, was approaching a tiny lake on the Nepal/Tibet borderwhen he was suddenly immobilised by overwhelming fear and a voice- that-was -not-a -voicecommanding him to go no further. Much as he struggled to do so the veteran expeditionerfound that he simply could not take another step forward. He retreated and hours laterreturned to find the psychic barrier had lifted. Cautiously proceeding, he discovered a line ofhuge five toed tracks along the muddy shore.

(11)There is no space to go into it here, but a number of lake monster and alien big cat witnesseshave also experienced the dreaded "nameless dread."

The scent of a yowieIn about 10% of yowie cases the creatures have exuded a mind-bogglingly foul stench. It canbe bad enough to make a person vomit and the pongy pongids seem to be able to release thechoking miasma at will. Usually the smell is compared to that of rotting meat, bat droppings or a ?badly kept countrydunny? but occasionally witnesses say the creatures left a distinct electrical smell ?like burntelectrical wiring?, ?burnt bakelite?, ?a sulphury stink?.
(12)Interestingly, in a very dramatic bigfoot/UFO case in Pennsylvania in 1973, witnessesdescribed a strong smell of sulphur and burning rubber.

(13)Jeepers creepersA weird detail which has cropped up repeatedly in America but also here is that the hairygiants' eyes are said not only to just reflect light but to glow in the dark as if lit from within.

(14)Knock knock, who's there? The polt connection As if the yowie/black panther/bunyip/UFO connection was not weird enough, three cases inour files suggest our Furry Friends might also have something in common with poltergeists.For example, in 1946, when George Nott and his family moved into a long-abandonedproperty near Wilcannia, they heard thumping sounds in the ceiling. Doors swung open,objects flew, and so many pebbles fell on the roof that they ?sounded like a heavy shower ofrain.? At the same time as this classic poltergeist phenomena , huge human-like tracksappeared in the yard and a large, very irate hairy ape-man began to invade the house, oncetrying to drag Mrs Nott outside.Not surprisingly, the family soon moved to an out-station.

(15)What's afoot? Thanks to the work of many investigators and eye-witnesses we now have a pretty goodcomposite description of the average yowie, from the top of his head down to ankle level.After that, however, things become a lot more confusing.Over the past 150 years or so people who have observed the yowies' feet or examined trackshave often disagreed not only on the general shape of the foot but even on the number of toes.Five-toed tracks may be the most common, but three, four and even six-toed tracks have beenreported by apparently reputable people, sometimes immediately after yowie sightings.

(16)The same problem arises in North America - and probably the Himalayas as well.Obviously, something is seriously amiss. Either an army of extremely ham-fisted hoaxers hasbeen at work on two continents for 150 years or the yowie, the sasquatch and company are, asI suspect, shape - shifters.

There is a great deal more extreme weirdness in our files but we do not have space to discussit all here. Instead I will conclude with one particular "high strangeness" case which is takingplace right now.Out of the Blue LabyrinthJerry and Sue O?Connor, the principal witnesses in this case, are happy to have their namesused, but asked me not to reveal the exact location of their property. Suffice to say they live inthe Blue Mountains to the south of the Great Western Highway, where the land immediatlybehind their house falls away into a vast maze of twisting, scrub-covered ravines known asthe Blue Labyrinth.Since moving into the area in September 1997 the O'Connors have been regularly visited byyowies, have seen them on numerous occasions, have fed them and have communicated withthem, both telepathically and by more conventional means.Many people will find the O'Connors' story difficult to accept, so I would like to emphasisehere that everything they have reported - even the apparent telepathic communication - hasbeen reported elsewhere in Australia or overseas.I find their testimony convincing not only because it has been, in effect, corroborated bysimilar testimony, but because I know Sue and Jerry and I trust them.For some time after the yowie activity began, Jerry, a down to earth ex-serviceman, couldhardly believe it himself. "My whole life was spun on its axis", he says. "It changed my wholebelief system."Sue, however, has always been interested in spiritual matters and it is just possible her openspirituality actually triggered the yowie visitations.Shortly after they moved into their house she conducted a quiet ceremony to invite the localnature spirits into their garden. Soon she and Jerry experienced strong feelings of dread and ofbeing watched. Their screen door rattled, the power box slammed, they heard crashing soundsin the scrub and, in November 1999, heard at seemingly point-blank range, a tremendous,terrifying roar as loud as that of a lion, yet indefinably alien - "other worldly".They then found about 30 huge bite marks up to 7 feet above the ground on young bloodwoodtrees, identical to those found by Neil Frost whose house, only a couple of kilometres away, isalso the focus of yowie activity.Deep grooves left by upper canines which were consistently 80 mm apart and by lowercanines which were always 55 mm apart seemed to prove the bites were all made by the sameindividual. It was clearly hunting for grubs. At about 2 o'clock one morning in August 2000 Sue woke from a disturbing dream which wasaccompanied by a weird "electric" feeling, looked up at the window behind their bed and sawa huge animal staring back at her. The creature had a human-sized head which lookeddisproportionatly small as it was set low into a pair of absolutely huge shoulders.As it was illuminated by a streetlight and a full moon, Sue could see the animal had a slimnose, a very wide mouth and a rounded clump of tan-coloured hair on top of its head.

Sue and Jerry have now experienced six similar sightings, always preceded by the strange"electric" dreams, cold chills and fear. To look through the bedroom window the creaturemust be over eight feet tall.It seems highly significant that the visits always occur just before or during Sue's monthlyperiods.For weeks they hid four infra red video surveillance cameras - loaned to them by yowiehunter Dean Harrison - at various key points around the yard. During those weeks the yowieapproached only once. Choosing the only night when a narrow quadrant was not covered bythe cameras, it reached the house and looked in as before.Like Neil Frost, Dean Harrison and others who have tried yowie hunting with infra redcameras, the O'Connors concluded the creatures can either detect IR light .... or read peoples'minds.On 25 October 2000 they hid a sound-activated tape recorder in a hollow stump next to a cliffover which they suspended a feed pot. They selected that particular spot because that sameafternoon, in the same area, Sue had seen a hunched, hairy, tan-coloured ape-like figurerunning through the undergrowth at phenomenal speed. A local man, Brad Croft, had alsorecently seen a huge yowie in the vicinity.In the morning they found the tape had registered heavy bipedal footsteps, the sound ofcamouflage being pulled away, and what sounded like dextrous fingers lifting the recorderand ripping its protective plastic. The final sound was a hollow thump to the feedpot, whichlay empty and shattered 35 feet away.Tracks found by the O'Connors reflect the confusing pattern elsewhere: some are three-toed,some five-toed.Communication {a} Thumping. Basic communication began one night when Jerry impulsively pounded onthe bedroom wall and yelled "how are ya goin' mate?" Two nights later a tattoo of knockscame by way of reply.{b} Crossed Sticks. More recently he has interacted with the creature{s} via patterns hemakes with sticks. He creates a pattern or structure and returns after a night or two to find thepattern has been thoughtfully rearranged. He feels the yowie{s} enjoy this game.{c} Psychic Communication. Not surprisingly, the O'Connors eventually decided the hairygiants had more in common with spirits than they did with normal animals, so Sue triedcontacting the creatures mentally.Eventually, on 31 October 2000, she established a telepathic link with what purported to betheir regular visitor - a female yowie.The creature conveyed that it resided in the "Black Dimension" but was a benign "being oflight" which was drawn to her and her garden.It conveyed its disapproval of the word ?yowie? and seemed to say it was ?of the bunyiprace?. Among other things it informed Sue it was immensely old -essentially immortal.

Recently Jerry, whose family nick-name is "Jock", left food outside the bedroomwindow for the yowie. Shortly thereafter he felt the "electro" sensation followed by a voice inhis head which said quite clearly, "thanks, Jock!"By any standards the O'Connors' story is petty weird, so it is worth repeating that everystrange detail Sue and Jerry mentioned has been reported elsewhere - right up to andincluding the telepathic communication - which has been mentioned frequently in Americaand once, memorably, by a Russian cryptozoologist. His close encounter with an almastigave rise to one of the weirdest headlines I've ever seen: " I HAD MY MIND READ BY THEABOMINABLE SNOW WOMAN OF THE PAMIRS" !----------------I think most open-minded readers will acknowledge that the "high strangeness" aspects of theyowie do suggest rather strongly that Australia's hairy giants are in some way paranormal.I cheerfully admit that, as Paul Cropper sometimes says, the paranormal "explanation" is not areal explanation at all. It is certainly not a complete explanation because it doesn't tell us whatthe yowies actually are. I believe, however, that by indicating what the yowies are not ( i.e.ordinary flesh and blood animals) and by identifying other phenomena to which they areapparently linked (UFOs, "black panthers", poltergeists) the "high strangeness" data may atleast bring us part of the way towards understanding the true nature of these bafflingcreatures.I'm far from the first yowie or bigfoot investigator to speculate about the paranormal. SeveralAmericans, notably John Keel and Jon Beckjord, have been writing about it for years. As farback as the 1930s a pioneer Australian cryptozoologist, RW McKay, noticed the apparentyowie-big cat connection and referred to them as "something supernatural". "Whatever theseanimals are ", he wrote, "they seem to have something protecting them ..." 18Fred Beck, last survivor of the 1924 Ape Canyon Incident, wrote in 1967 that "... wegenuinely fought (the sasquatches) and were quite fearful ... but I was always conscious thatwe were dealing with supernatural beings, and ... the other ( men) felt the same."Something else Fred Beck said is very interesting in light of what the yowie told SueO'Connor about the "Black Dimension": the sasquatches, he said, "... are from a lower plane.When the condition and vibration is at a certain frequency, they can easily, for a time, appearin a very solid body." 19In conclucion I'd like to mention something I heard in the Florida Everglades from a memberof the Miccosukee tribe. Their term for the bigfoot is yati wasagi , meaning "seperated" or"different man"; they, too, believe the creatures can "phase in" from another dimension.One man, Bobby Tiger, said something, which, when I reflect on it now, in the troubled yearof 2001, makes me a little uneasy: 'All these things are part real and part not. We're going tosee more and more of them in different places. Then eventually the world will 'turn over onitself ' - and they'll phase in, while we phase out."Freaky.

Notes:1. Fred Beck, I Fought The Apemen of Mt St Helens, self published, 1967, p. 16.2. For a detailed comparison, see Tony Healy and Paul Cropper, Out of the Shadows, Ironbark/ Macmillen 1994, pp. 153-55.3. Ibid, p.1894. John Green, Sasquatch - The Apes Among Us, Hancock House, 1978, pp.260-61.5. Anderson, F., "The Yowie Mystery", Bigfoot, Tales of Unexplained Creatures. No further bibliographical information available.6. Janet and Colin Bord, The Bigfoot Casebook, Stackpole Books, 1982, p.112.7. Anderson, op. cit. 8. The Advertiser, Adelaide, 5 July 1973.9. Sydney Sun, 10 November 1912.10. Tony Healy, Monster Safari, unpublished MS , 1982, P.229.11. Tony Healy, notes of interview with Bill Grant, Scotland, 1999.!2. Healy and Cropper, op. cit. , pp. 127 and 129.13. Janet and Colin Bord, op. cit., p.115.14. Paul Cropper, notes of interview with Richard McDonald, April 2001.15. Martin McAdoo, If Only I'd Listened To Grandpa, Landsdown Press, 1980, chapter 4.16. Healy and Cropper, op. cit. , pp.141-43.17. McKay, RW, letters to Rod Estoppey, 13 Nov 1934 and 22 April 1940.18. Fred Beck, op. cit. , pp.7 and 10.
“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” - Nikola Tesla

User formally known as chewy
User avatar
lil foot
Silver Status
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:14 pm
Position: Crypto Enthusiast
Location: melbourne, australia

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by lil foot »

doctorscream wrote:I had the opportunity to visit with another research team who had been quite successful at getting strange stuff to occur at their research site. Things like cameras and tape recorders being turned off when they put them outside the windows of their vehicles, bigfoot turning into orbs, rattling of old rusted containers from being hit with a rock yet no rocks were in or around the container, bigfoot snorting and then running up a log while doing dimension changes on the fly leaving nothing left but the wind blowing on leaves at the far end of the log, beeping noises coming from the brush, small swirling clouds coming briefly out of the ground and then disappearing back into the ground, etc. You know. Ordinary bigfoot stuff. Yet virtually all of the research team was in total denial of the bigfoot being anything other than dumb animals. None had college degrees I might add. It seems that they were certain that humans were higher on the pecking order ladder, and bigfoot were somewhere below us. When asked about whether they thought that bigfoot could be people, those that had seen a bigfoot, (and most of them had), were certain that they were not people. They apparently came to that scientific conclusion based on appearances. mmmm! Perhaps we should rewrite the "scientific method" so that it is based purely on opinions of appearance. When asked about all the strange stuff, they just blocked that out of their mind because they could not explain it. And they certainly would not attribute the strange stuff as evidence that bigfoot were either intelligent, were people or that they possessed special abilities that they were showing off to them. I sat around the campfire with my jaw agape, in total disbelief at what I was listening to. One after the other, each revealing evidence of their own copout at attempting to study a scientific mystery with an open mind. When asked to describe what happened on the individual events, they could not recall all the details because most were not observing as scientists, but instead were trying to fit what they just saw or heard into a known flesh & blood phenomenon that they were already familiar with.


hey doctordream, you seem to like bigmouthing yourself and putting down under educated or anyone below your education level, this isnt the first time of seen you discriminate, so what if people dont have a college degree or arnt scientists, most people i know who are very acedemic dont have much common sense, but i dont bag them for not being able to do everyday tasks well. i got to year11 at school, but learned way more out in the big world in that first year compared to the 11 years of schooling. and i know my animal and plant kingdom extremely well, i live and breath it. (smart a**)
and what has science got to do with your claims, i have friends in the science field and i know they would also think you were a nutter, if they were in that research party who saw these things, they would also say 'flesh and blood' because thats the way science would point.
to me your just full of opinions without evidence. and im really hoping that the concrete proof is released this year, just so you have to zip it.
id also like to ask what brought you here? isnt there enough bf forums in the u.s for you to grace, or did they grow tired of you too?
ON THE OCCASION WHEN IM NOT WRONG, IM ALWAYS RIGHT!
Rastus
Bronze Status
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:37 am
Position: Believer

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Rastus »

wow... really all I can say is wow. Each to their own I say but some peoples views are just plain crazy. Doctorscream I dont doubt you were around in the 60's cause I think you may have dropped a little to much acid man. I dont see why you have to go out to the field to communicate with these invisible beings as surely something that powerful could go anywhere it pleases? Drum away mate :)

Being only new to these pages I can clearly see the 3 types of members, the undiscovered line of apes or missing link type believers, the sceptics and the paranormal interdimensional super beings. Thats all fine and dandy and as I said each to their own.Everyones entitled to their own beliefs . Most of the population regards anyone who believes in yowies as a bit left of centre so to speak and thats the people who believe in the normal apeman theory of the yowie etc! While there is no soild undeniable proof of the mainstream view of the yowie ( otherwise there would be one in the local zoo's knowing how we humans are :) ) there is at least footprints, environmental evidence, out of focus grainy films :) etc that something might exist.

Wild theories on the other hand have far far less possible evidence and rely on very unplausable and totally unconfirmable scenarios. How the hell do you confirm the existence of multiple dimensions on top of the ones we know exist when the boffins cant even do it? I cant disprove it but neither can you prove it. What little hard evidence we have though of a more normalised view of the yowie /sasquatch/yeti etc is a lot more believable than dimension hopping hairy men.

But people are entitled to their view and I respect that. Hell even my cat believes she owns the place and I am but a servant so i guess anything is possible :)
doctorscream

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by doctorscream »

Rastus, You are a bit of a contradiction. With one breath you take the high road and state that "everyone is entitled to their own beliefs". But with another breath, you jump into the gutter and resort to childish insinuations of drug abuse, presumeably because the extent of your brain power does not encompass the possibility of other dimensions. Take a look in the Orb section. Every single one of those Orb photos is a being that exists in another dimension. In conclusion, Sir Rastus, you ought to get your story straight if we are expected to take you seriously, henceforth. Right now, I will pencil you in as a 24/7 Flesh & Blood believer, even though you cannot put your hands on a Yowie when you want to. Nor can you explain tracks that start nor tracks that end. Nor can you explain the apparently standard sickening feeling that a few of the chaps are reporting.

cheers
Rastus
Bronze Status
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:37 am
Position: Believer

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Rastus »

So I'm unable to voice my opinion and still let everyone have their own beliefs? Frankly Doctor I could call you a lot of worse things without smiley faces on the end to show I am being light hearted about it.

I apologise if it struck a nerve, that was not my intent, i didnt realise you were devoid of a sense of humour. And while I dont discount the possibility of other dimensions, I just dont believe you are in contact with inter dimensional space hopping yowies with a penchant for drumming. Must be my lack of brainpower as you put it.

I stick by my claim that you can believe what you want to, its your mind it belongs to you, but Im pretty sure the intent of this Forum when it was made by the sites owner was for the debate, questioning and relation of peoples experiences or ideas on the various topics included under the forums. Call me terrible for questioning or voicing my opinion on something you have posted under the public domain. Your ideas are not mainstream in a field deemed not mainstream by a large percentage of the population. That does not mean it is wrong. It just means that I happen to disagree with it.

Oops, I voiced my opinion. (no no)
doctorscream

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by doctorscream »

And here is a NEW DEVELOPMENT in Bigfoot/Yowie research. So new that the paint is not even dry on the ink, nor has it been lost in an archive somewhere.

Henry Franzoni, mentor for paranormlists such as Thom Powell, has come back to talk on the internet about his new book that is now available. Henry is a Reed College Graduate, which is noted for it's high standards for admittance, which will become quite obvious. I haven't read his book so I have no idea what is in it.

http://www.blubrry.com/sasquatch/341675 ... interview/

Since the harassing phone rings are rolling in as I type this, I presume the night shift at the NSA does not approve of me making this post. So there must be something in the interview listed above, that they do not want you to hear. You just can't get a better invitation than that, unless it was specially delivered by a bikini clad black ops undercover mole in drag, with a 3 day old scraggly beard hid behind his foundation makeup.
topender
Forum Moderator
Posts: 629
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:42 pm
Position: Field Researcher
Location: The wilds of northern territory

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by topender »

Man.....are you serious??????????????....really???????? (cries)
This planet is a one big farm, we are not the farmers but the stock
User avatar
Jo Blose
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:50 am
Position: Lurker
Gender: Not Telling

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Jo Blose »

That interview is highly relevant to this topic. It raises the 'invisibility' issue yet deals with it all in a way anybody who has contributed to this thread, can appreciate. It's well worth listening to and incorporates F&B and Paranormal, in a well balanced manner.
doctorscream

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by doctorscream »

topender, In answer to your question, I am absolutely serious. The NSA has me on their speed dial.

The fearsome foursome of the US Paranormal Bigfoot Braintrust, all live within a 45 minute drive of each other. Which is why the NSA opened up a field office nearby and their NO. 1 MOLE works undercover there. Just not very well, because he pretty much sucks at undercover. But they also have backups who all think that they have not blown their cover yet either. They even have a small mobile camper equipped with rotating radar type discs and the electronics to track both a GM vehicle with a powertrain control module (1996 and later GM models) or cell phones that are ON but not in use. You have to pull the battery out of your cell phone and drive an old beater if you don't want them to follow you to any locations. If Obama only knew the real truth, he would recreate an old fashion southern lynching of his top thought cops. If the paranormal braintrust did not have it at least close to right, the NSA would leave them alone. The strange part is that even having a reasonable idea what Bigfoot is, does not make them any closer to getting evidence if they wanted to, than the moronic majority. And I don't think that they especially want to because all evidence can be either faked or claimed to be faked. Plus, anything that you could produce would fall on deaf ears or blind eyes. The public can only learn about Bigfoot from experiencing Bigfoot, not from be told about them on the evening news. All in my opinion of course.
User avatar
_Daniel_
Bronze Status
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:50 pm
Position: Field Researcher
Location: SE QLD

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by _Daniel_ »

doctorscream wrote:topender, In answer to your question, I am absolutely serious. The NSA has me on their speed dial.

The fearsome foursome of the US Paranormal Bigfoot Braintrust, all live within a 45 minute drive of each other. Which is why the NSA opened up a field office nearby and their NO. 1 MOLE works undercover there. Just not very well, because he pretty much sucks at undercover. But they also have backups who all think that they have not blown their cover yet either. They even have a small mobile camper equipped with rotating radar type discs and the electronics to track both a GM vehicle with a powertrain control module (1996 and later GM models) or cell phones that are ON but not in use. You have to pull the battery out of your cell phone and drive an old beater if you don't want them to follow you to any locations. If Obama only knew the real truth, he would recreate an old fashion southern lynching of his top thought cops. If the paranormal braintrust did not have it at least close to right, the NSA would leave them alone. The strange part is that even having a reasonable idea what Bigfoot is, does not make them any closer to getting evidence if they wanted to, than the moronic majority. And I don't think that they especially want to because all evidence can be either faked or claimed to be faked. Plus, anything that you could produce would fall on deaf ears or blind eyes. The public can only learn about Bigfoot from experiencing Bigfoot, not from be told about them on the evening news. All in my opinion of course.
Okay, now i know you're joking... i was going along for the ride just for fun, but c'mon, if the NSA didn't want you to post- you'd be dead... if they didn't want the book published, it wouldn't be... simple as that... you have some interesting posts but ease up on the paranoia...
To find what you seek in the road of life, the best proverb of all is that which says:"Leave no stone unturned."
Edward Bulwer Lytton
doctorscream

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by doctorscream »

Daniel, What makes you think that the NSA kills bigfoot researchers who knew the truth? If they did that, then they would be out of a job and then shipped off to a foreign country where the people that they watch actually have guns that they are not afraid to use on them.

I have caught other vehicles tailing me as well, other than their electronic tracking RV. When you catch the same white sedan following you at 2 am in the morning down a forest road that you have noticed following you before, and you can tell that they were not either equipped to be out their camping or should have been driving a rough road in that sedan, then you know that someone is extremely motivated to shut you down. Especially when you pull off and wait for them to pass you. Where I then hit them with your headlights, and they then escaped back to the big city by promptly accelerating to well above the speed limit.

Books are free speech guaranteed in the US Constitution. They know that normally, no more than a couple hundred books are sold of each Bigfoot book. Of that 200, most readers will forget everything that they read within the following year. The remainder will forget it by the end of the next year. They can handle those kinds of losses. Most books are useless for contacting Bigfoot and/or communicating with a Bigfoot. The NSAs mission statement would likely involve optimizing their effort by pursuing the most productive tasks that prevent a foreign power from acquiring a Bigfoot that will consent to being a trained assassin. Since the US has apparently been completely unsuccessful at training one to date, a foreign power would likely be even more unsuccessful. Consequently, they break in their rookie female and effeminant male recruits with the tracking and harassing of Bigfoot researchers, since there is pretty much no way that they can fail at their missions of ultimately preventing a foreign power from accomplishing the impossible. So Bigfoot researchers are kind of like guinea pigs that they experiment on with psychological operations, deny them their constituional rights, and observe the effects of their telephone harassment and vehicle tailing. They also take steps to run Bigfoot out of areas that they determine a researcher returns to, get researchers fired from their jobs, or make them unemployable by placing their names on the internet as nut case bigfoot researchers. That is US taxpayer dollars at work, instead of doing more important things like feeding the poor, fighting a war in IRAQ, fixing the world economy, or putting unethical real estate appraisers, loan officers and wall street packagers of junk real estate paper IN JAIL.
User avatar
_Daniel_
Bronze Status
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:50 pm
Position: Field Researcher
Location: SE QLD

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by _Daniel_ »

doctorscream wrote: names on the internet as nut case bigfoot researchers
Jeez mate, that's awful, i hope you're not on the list...
To find what you seek in the road of life, the best proverb of all is that which says:"Leave no stone unturned."
Edward Bulwer Lytton
tyson
Approved Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by tyson »

(confused) Can someone answer this for me if they are paranormal/dimensional jumpers of some sort Why dont we
see or hear of reports in shopping centres,,,or am I missing something....10years under my belt chasing this thing and yet to see and hear what I have heard in the field...
User avatar
Big Cats
Bronze Status
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:10 pm
Position: Flesh and Blood

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Big Cats »

Hi Tyson

Who knows! I guess any answer to that question would be pure supposition.

Interesting question though, just the same!

Big Cats
http://uqconnect.net/~zzpclach/index.htm

"Make No Comparisons
Make No Judgments
Delete Your Need to Understand"


Joy Brugh W., “Joy’s Way”, Tarcher / Putnam (Penguin), New York, 1979, ISBN 0-87477-085-8. pp. 60 - 66.
Night Walker

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Night Walker »

A few points before continuing on with this debate:

1. I have a copy of “Skinwalkers” on order an am looking forward to studying it … especially those pages noted by Big Cats.

2. I thank doctordream for beginning this thread. Natural v Supernatural is crucial in the understanding of the Yowie phenomenon.

3. I appreciate your wit, Mike, and that you attempted to address at least some of the issues I raised. That you chose to shoot the messenger rather than tackle the message is unfortunate. It is disappointing that certain topics are taboo here but I can accept that that is how it is and will move on.

4. This debate has enflamed passions. Let’s try to keep it relevant and emotion-free. The debate is interesting enough in itself.

____________________________________________________________________

Q. Where are all the supposed supernatural Yowie encounters?

Respected researcher Tony Healy seems inclined towards some sort of supernatural explanation for Yowies so I went back over his book - Healy & Cropper (2006) ”The Yowie: In Search of Australia’s Bigfoot” - to search for supporting evidence. Of the 282 listed Yowie accounts, many credited to Dean Harrison and AYR, I could only find 12 cases that were even remotely supernatural:

* one of a group of people fainting and unable to be awoken for several hours - unusual but not outside the realms of possibility when considering shock.

* an 1860 report claiming the Yowie could “belch forth fire.” - clearly ridiculous with no comparisons elsewhere.

* a woman who “from fright became almost spellbound, screamed and screeched, but unable to run.” - not an unusual outcome in a frightening situation.

* boys who were “taken ill after their fright” - again, not an unusual reaction. Possible shock.

* 1946 High strangeness at a location near Wilcannia - no reasonable explanation.

* an “ape-like creature walking along the side of the road with what looked like a lantern in it’s hand” - this case is not well documented even for UFO standards.

* a woman who felt “mesmerised” by a pair of Yowies as they stared back at her through the window - feeling no fear, a sense of enchantment by this unusual encounter is quite possible.

* during an encounter a “well-maintained motorbike at 1st refused to start and then revved uncontrollably - I am no mechanical expert but considering the boys highly agitated state it doesn’t seem very otherworldly.

* eyes which seemed to glow by themselves (ie no obvious source of reflection/illumination) - unusual and occasionally reported elsewhere.

* a wallaby appeared mesmerised by a Yowie’s deep growl - documented effects of infrasound.

* a boy who slept soundly for 2 hours after relating a terrifying encounter - shock.

* a Yowie who seemed to detect and avoid infrared light - many animals can be shown to detect differing ranges of sound and vision.

So, of these12 unusual cases only 2 - Wilcannia high strangeness account and the glowing eyes - could be considered to be paranormal and the latter account may have some natural explanation that we are unaware of at the current time.

2 accounts out of 282.

0.7% of cases.

That is even less than the hoaxes listed in Healy and Cropper’s book.

Should we include FEAR in the potential supernatural explanations? 38 cases mentioned varying degrees of panic among humans and/or animals when encountering a Yowie. Considering that Yowies generally resemble large hairy man-monsters it is perhaps surprising that there weren’t a lot more cases involving panic. Fear is a perfectly natural response to an unexpected and terrifying encounter (surprisingly, quite a few cases suggested it was the Yowie who hastily retreated in fear). Add the effects of an infrasound growl and the supernatural hypothesis for fear generated by Yowies is redundant.

What about the smell? 25 cases mentioned a foul odour. Most descriptions of the smell give very little detail, some describe it in natural terms - rotting flesh, urine - but 3 accounts say the odour was like “burnt bakelite”, “sulphurous”, and a “burning smell”. Unusual perhaps but hardly otherworldy.

I haven’t gotten around to reading all the reports listed on the AYR site but I have yet to find a single paranormal encounter. So what is this obsession with the supernatural?

Here’s a quote from earlier in this thread by a researcher pondering the otherworldliness of a recent experience:
joe black wrote:I was at a hotspot the other evening and heard a low level growl noise which not only had no fixed point of emanation, but I found myself questioning whether what I was hearing was 'real', meaning I have never heard such a vibration of sound before.
What is paranormal about not being able to locate the source of a low (possibly infrasound) growl at night in a presumably forested mountain environment? That it stumped even doctorscream speaks volumes.

Dean’s own account, mentioned by Chewy:
I recall (as some of you all may also), while on Expedition at Kilkivan. Myself, Brett Green, Mick Dale and Trevor were at base when an Elephant on two legs steamrolled through the forest smashing down tree’s on the other side of the creek. I asked the others to keep talking and act natural, while I go and get the footage. I was determined, very confident and feeling bullet proof.

I raced down the creek and quick as I could, extremely excited. The moment I stepped up onto that bank, I hit a wall of ice that not only shut ME down, but also every living animal around me also.

I was determined not to let it win, so I continued on step by step. I became nauseous, sweating, shaking, goose bumps, cold and hair on end. Every step I placed made me more and more ill until finally I dropped to the ground and couldn’t move. I evaluated myself throughly many times, and it was not a fear or sickness coming from with in. It was more like being somehow riddled with negative external energy like a force field (that’s the only way I can put it). I knew it was right there somewhere and the Dread was flowing through my veins.

It wasn’t until 4 minutes later I could begin to move. Right at that point all the animals and bugs became alive and definitely noisy again. Now I could move again, I checked every tree, rock and hiding place, but it was gone. Without a sound. Something that large in dense dry foliage and dry leafy ground, to vanish without breaking a twig was extraordinary to say the least.
This is engrossing but highly subjective. Dean went to get footage but did he record this on film for all to see and experience for themselves? Did any of the others present actually see Dean going through this internal struggle?

Getting objective physical evidence for the existence of Yowies is hard enough - reliable evidence is few and far between. There is no objective physical evidence for the supernatural hypothesis. It is all just wild speculation.

So, back to the original question: Where are all the supposed supernatural Yowie encounters?

More importantly: Why are we even wasting our time discussing the supernatural as if it were a viable explanation? It is a distraction from the main prize - the discovery of one or more as yet unidentified species of hominid. Surely the greatest discovery of all time! What more inspiration do we need?

p.s. If you are bored with this thread either let me know or simply don’t reply. I feel like I’m banging my head against a brick wall sometimes…
User avatar
iwanttobelieve
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 295
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:32 am
Location: Darwin

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by iwanttobelieve »

Night Walker wrote:If you are bored with this thread either let me know or simply don’t reply. I feel like I’m banging my head against a brick wall sometimes…
There's nothing boring about this thread Walker.

It's the most interesting thing posted since the infamous "Dean Vs Yowie" encounter which seems to have died a natural death.

It's good to see some spirited discussion.


(thumb up)
Image

Your sacred space is where you can find yourself again and again.
Mike Williams
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 704
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:01 pm
Position: New Member
Location: Blue Mountains

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Mike Williams »

3. I appreciate your wit, Mike, and that you attempted to address at least some of the issues I raised. That you chose to shoot the messenger rather than tackle the message is unfortunate. It is disappointing that certain topics are taboo here but I can accept that that is how it is and will move on.
Hi Nightwalker..

Glad you appreciate the frivolous tone of my post. (thumb up)
Asking you questions = "shoot the messenger". (scared)
The only taboo here appears to be.....you dont like being asked questions about your own claims....Fair enough!..each to his own... (cool)

Mike
Night Walker

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Night Walker »

I intend on answering the 2 questions you raised.

The 1st about the value of scat analysis:

Sure, scat analysis fails to deliver any useful DNA sequences but can provide a wealth of information regarding seasonal diet and intestinal parasites and bacteria.

Your 2nd question questioning evidence over the last 500 years is a good one deserving it's own thread. As far as I'm aware nobody has really attempted to answer it with any detail so that is what I'd like to do. Currently, I am researching the topic and will hopefully provide a long and detailed analysis for scrutiny. As you are most likely aware, research involves much more than simply yahooing through the bush.

It will take some time, of course, and your patience would be appreciated.

In the mean time I will continue asking and answering questions in this most important endeavour...
Mike Williams
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 704
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:01 pm
Position: New Member
Location: Blue Mountains

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Mike Williams »

Hey Nightwalker
Its really great to see someone actually take the time to do some research and read some of the literature...and go through reports Like you have.!!
So few even own any books on the phenomena let alone actually read them properly.
Regarding Cropper and healy..thats an old book...their latest book "The Yowie" deals with the paranormal aspects/reports/problems with f/b hypothesis..
So, back to the original question: Where are all the supposed supernatural Yowie encounters?
In the literature.
Its not just the witness reports...its other associations/problems/correlations which are ignored as well by mainstream rsearchers.
To give you a taste of the sections from "The Yowie"..1/the yowie international man of mystey 2/yowie and sasquatch the terrible twins 3/The frighteners 4/nameless dread6/feeling abominable 6/infrasound 7/hairy hypnotists 8/causs of illnesses
and death 9/tracks 10/jeepers creepers 11/the yowie/sasquatch/black panther connection 12/hairy wallbangers, a polt connection 13/beam me down scotty 14/beam me down scotty 15/dimensions..and the witnesses themselves..face to face.....people will report what appears to be a straight f/b report..yet when you actually talk to them they will ascribe movement/sounds/physical qualities that dont appear to be related to any known animals abilities...yet they will tell you the animal they saw was f/b..
More importantly: Why are we even wasting our time discussing the supernatural as if it were a viable explanation?
"We"..are wasting our time posting because You posted in this thread...and I replied.
At first the f/b option seems logical...and nice and clean..but after awhile some people accept their are many problems associated with it.
I can understand from a cognitive dissonance perspective why many would find the suggestion of the paranormal as crazy.
They would also believe, correctly I might add....that this makes the whole phenomena appear even crazier than it actually is..
Perhaps..but the phenomena is a fringe subject anyway.
And "we" were not exactly fighting off any form of scientific/$$$ offers/interest before over the years anyway..yet alone now.
1/if the yowie was the only unidentified "hominid' around the world that was popping up in just australia...then you would be in with a chance...the crux of the problem is this...How would it be possible for unidentified hominid like forms(one/2 species???)to have been popping up in some many continents for so long...and never have been found after 500 years..the more countries these things pop up in...the weaker the initial hypothesis of "its just a sneeky hominid" becomes.
All f/b advocates ignore this major problem...!!!
The book "Three men chasing monsters" is centred in the UK...they have hairy hominds popping up their now..what are the odds...???
2/Its an intelligent homind ..becomes it cannot be found..therefore its an intelligent homind which is just a rhetorical flourish..and nothing more...where is the intelligence displayed other than being good at hiding..I have had mice and rats that were good at hiding..but i didnt leap to any conclusions they were smart because of it.
3/The feet dont make sense...read croppers book for that..
4/What other normal animals...have witnesses reports of paranormal interaction/encounters etc ?
5/Paradoxically..many are attracted to the paranormal angle..because their is nearly zero evidence for f/b hominds roaming on 5 continents for 500 years with out leaving any bodies/being shot/captured etc...look how long mountain gorillas lasted after first being spotted by white people..2 dead within a few hours...
6/Does the paranormal explain this phenomena..yes and no...by saying "its paranormal" explains why there is diddly squat evidence...how could there be...but doesnt explain what these things are...how could it...
7/Some people confuse the term paranormal with whispy whirls of smoke or something..and ask..."but it cannot effect the physical enviroment"..there are reports in the paranormal of physical effects on/with objects...if people dont know then they
should research it..if they dont believe it..I dont care..
8/where are all the examples of yowie predated animals...?
9/Where are all the evidence of species lines for all these "hominids"?
10/where is any fossil/skeleton evidence for any of the truly large hominid reports from any continent on earth...
This bit as well as the foot problems interests me the most since I did a few years part time in paleoanthropology...switched to zoology...(when I looked at the phone book for the first unit on dna I fled in terror).
11/Many of the reports in hazelbrook, centre round a couple of strips of forest in between streets...why in gods name would a hairy giant bother to prance around in these areas, scare people and dogs...when it has 10 zillion acres of forests with no one to bother them...to peak at tv perhaps..bored..?
12/Does the "explanation"= the unidentified homind is paranormal answer a mystery by using a mystery.Answer=YES.
Does the "explanation" =The unidentified homind is an unidentifed homind answer a mystery using a mystery.Answer=YES.
There are many problems with f/b as there are many for the paranormal..as there are many for the sceptical viewpoint.....I dont know the answer...
The phenomena is "real"...what it actually is..thats the problem...
I can gurantee you one thing though..
In 10 years..if this board is still here...the same arguments will still be carrying on here..there will still be no bodies on the table...whilst outside..in the forests...something big and hairy and truly profound will be roaming around..

Cheers to you.. (thumb up)
Mike
User avatar
Big Cats
Bronze Status
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:10 pm
Position: Flesh and Blood

Re: Whats the Yowie Belief Split Percentage, downunder?

Unread post by Big Cats »

Hi Mike

"cognitive dissonance" I love that!!! (smart a**)

Big Cats
http://uqconnect.net/~zzpclach/index.htm

"Make No Comparisons
Make No Judgments
Delete Your Need to Understand"


Joy Brugh W., “Joy’s Way”, Tarcher / Putnam (Penguin), New York, 1979, ISBN 0-87477-085-8. pp. 60 - 66.
Post Reply